7+ years in seti!!!

nexus_7 · Post by **nexus_7** » Wed Dec 06, 2000 9:02 pm

excelent. a few SLACKERS in the mix but still we are doing good.

Greg

dadx2mj · Post by **dadx2mj** » Wed Dec 06, 2000 9:35 pm

Cool 2 more work units and I make 300 still can't figure out why it takes me so long to complete a unit I have a p3 600@800 and it is taking about 9-10 hours per unit. I am running version 2.04 is there a different version I should be running?

York1 · Post by **York1** » Wed Dec 06, 2000 10:04 pm

I run the CL Version 3.0 and I get about 6 hours per WU on a
PIII800@912 Using Seti Driver to hide it

wesg · Post by **wesg** » Wed Dec 06, 2000 11:14 pm

york1,

where do i get that seti driver to hide mine ?
for some stupid reason i keep maximizing mine and exiting
need to get it out of reach

Ladies Man · Post by **Ladies Man** » Wed Dec 06, 2000 11:30 pm

i ave about 9 hours but i get about dual 7 hours

MK888 · Post by **MK888** » Wed Dec 06, 2000 11:50 pm

hey dadx2mj[/] Are you running the graphical version? And if so are you running it as the screen saver? If so, turn it off, and configure it to run all the time, minimized. I have found that running seti as the screen saver would result in packets taking 20-30 hours on my p2-400. Running minimized all the time, I get between 10-15 hours!

York1 · Post by **York1** » Thu Dec 07, 2000 6:14 am

http://home.sprintmail.com/~obermd/SETIDriver/

All kinds of links to Seti stuff

=http://setiathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/links.html#links_win

dadx2mj · Post by **dadx2mj** » Fri Dec 08, 2000 12:07 am

I am running the graphic version but not as the screne saver it runs minimized in back ground all the time I wonder if running SETI driver would be any faster. I just downloaded it think I will give it a try

smb · Post by **smb** » Fri Dec 08, 2000 12:15 am

the only real way to get seti to run faster is to use one the 3.0 command line version.

GRIFFIN1 · Post by **GRIFFIN1** » Fri Dec 08, 2000 12:36 am

My duron @ 1 gig cranks one out in about 4:35. This is using the WinNT command line version 3.0. The WinNT command line version is much faster than the graphical win9x version, and it works fine in anything above windows 95.

[url]ftp://ftp.cdrom.com/pub/setiathome/setiathome-3.0.i386-winnt-cmdline.exe[/url]

My old P3 450@600 would do a work unit in about 6 hours. I also have a tbird running at 850 that would do a work unit in about 4:55. Not much slower than the duron running 150MHz faster, but that 20 minutes is why the tbird is sitting on my desk now.

renovation · Post by **renovation** » Fri Dec 08, 2000 12:42 am

i have over 1000 hours in kool !!!!