Now running w/ 8gb

Discussions about anything Computer Hardware Related. Overclocking, underclocking and talk about the latest or even the oldest technology. PCA Reviews feedback
Post Reply
User avatar
nexus_7
Posts: 10306
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2000 12:09 pm
Location: chicago land area.
Contact:

Now running w/ 8gb

Post by nexus_7 »

That should be enough to surf the web...I hope. ;)
<a href="http://www.pcabusers.org" target="_new"> <img src="http://www.pcabusers.org/images1/banner.jpg" border="0"></a>
<a target=NEW href="http://setiathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/stats/team/team_87793.html">JOIN the PCA Seti Team!</a>
User avatar
GuardianAsher
Golden Member
Posts: 1102
Joined: Mon Aug 01, 2005 12:30 am
Location: Lubbock, TX

Post by GuardianAsher »

Eh, don't count on it XD But extra RAM is sweet. Little Dell I bought a while back had a quad core and 6GB of DDR3. Only way I can max it out is if I run a bunch of VMWares in it. Windows 7 Memory Management :w oot
User avatar
normalicy
Posts: 9513
Joined: Sat Nov 25, 2000 4:04 am
Location: St. Louis, MO USA
Contact:

Post by normalicy »

Welcome to the club. It's amazing how quickly you can use it up on Photoshop if you try.
User avatar
b-man1
Posts: 5201
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2000 10:23 am

Post by b-man1 »

after my recent rebuild, i'm still running on 4GB. no problems at that amount, but as normalicy said, 8GB is ideal these days Photoshop type work. it looks like the RAM i bought a few months ago is not over $20 less, so i'll probably pick up another 4GB soon.
User avatar
FlyingPenguin
Flightless Bird
Posts: 32784
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2000 11:13 am
Location: Central Florida
Contact:

Post by FlyingPenguin »

Yeah I just upgraded from 4 to 8Gb because NewEgg had a nice Black Friday deal on RAM. Honestly, I didn't NEED but yeah, Photoshop sure likes it.
Christians warn us about the anti-christ for 2,000 years, and when he shows up, they buy a bible from him.

Image
User avatar
Executioner
Life Member
Posts: 10141
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2000 11:34 am
Location: Woodland, CA USA

Post by Executioner »

LOL - I guess I'm being left behind. I'm still running XP with 2 gigs.
User avatar
eGoCeNTRoNiX
Posts: 7362
Joined: Wed Oct 23, 2002 12:51 pm
Location: HELL

Post by eGoCeNTRoNiX »

Executioner wrote:LOL - I guess I'm being left behind. I'm still running XP with 2 gigs.
X2 except 3GB lol

eGo
PM before Email People!!
Image
Heat Under eGoCeNTRoNiX :)
Who Farted? BEANIE!!!
!Welcome to the United States of the Offended!
User avatar
FlyingPenguin
Flightless Bird
Posts: 32784
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2000 11:13 am
Location: Central Florida
Contact:

Post by FlyingPenguin »

Well the problem is that Win7 really shines with 3Gb or more (XP can run nicely on 2Gb). Also the x64 versions of Windows runs better with 4Gb or more. Not because it's inherently more memory hungry, but because you're using twice the memory bandwidth with each CPU cycle, so there's a bit more overhead.
Christians warn us about the anti-christ for 2,000 years, and when he shows up, they buy a bible from him.

Image
User avatar
CaterpillarAssassin
Almighty Member
Posts: 2252
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2000 11:29 am
Location: somewhere in N.E

Post by CaterpillarAssassin »

I have x64 windows vista with 8gb. I've never seen it go over 60%. Generally hovers at 30-35% usage. DDR2 was extremely cheap at the time (2 years ago was $120 for 8gb).
Image
User avatar
ZYFER
Posts: 2137
Joined: Thu Nov 07, 2002 4:10 pm
Location: Tampa Bay, Florida

Post by ZYFER »

With how much of a RAM hog flash stuff is these days... You can't really say you have enough...

Still running Windows XP with 4GB of RAM. This old rig isn't worth much more effort, will likely stack out the next one though.

I loaded Windows 7 btw to test it out on my old POS laptop with less than a gig of memory. Vista never ran that good, regardless of the service pack.
When all else fails, replace the user.
Post Reply