New Unigine Superposition performance benchmark

Discussions and tips on NVidia, ATI, etc. and Video Editing Forum
Post Reply
User avatar
Nuby1Canuby
Posts: 385
Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2012 10:45 am

New Unigine Superposition performance benchmark

Post by Nuby1Canuby »

You can get it here: https://unigine.com/en/products/benchma ... erposition

Even a GTX 1080 will only average 30 FPS at 1080P with the Extreme preset.


I ran it on my Radeon 290x @ 1080P and got an average FPS of 19.5 on the extreme preset and 45 on the high preset.
Last edited by Nuby1Canuby on Sun Apr 16, 2017 6:15 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Nuby1Canuby
Posts: 385
Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2012 10:45 am

Re: New Unigine Superposition performance benchmark

Post by Nuby1Canuby »

I ran it at 5280x1050 on my 290X. It was running about 21 FPS on high shaders so I had to drop them to medium.
It's not using much CPU. I ran it with Statuscore @1080P and the 4 cores were only averaging about 1000 GHz.

Image
User avatar
Genom
Steely Eyed Missile Man
Posts: 866
Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2014 4:14 pm
Location: Hotlanta

Re: New Unigine Superposition performance benchmark

Post by Genom »

Doing the 4K optimized on my 1070 gave about 5800 score. Picked that rez so it was a similar number of pixels to yours since I dont do the multi desktop ona signle card.
User avatar
NubyCanuby_OFC
Posts: 636
Joined: Sat Dec 10, 2005 12:59 am
Location: South Surrey, BC, Canada
Contact:

Re: New Unigine Superposition performance benchmark

Post by NubyCanuby_OFC »

Genom wrote:Doing the 4K optimized on my 1070 gave about 5800 score. Picked that rez so it was a similar number of pixels to yours since I dont do the multi desktop ona signle card.
What was the average FPS on that?
User avatar
Genom
Steely Eyed Missile Man
Posts: 866
Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2014 4:14 pm
Location: Hotlanta

Re: New Unigine Superposition performance benchmark

Post by Genom »

Here ya go:

Image
User avatar
FlyingPenguin
Flightless Bird
Posts: 32773
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2000 11:13 am
Location: Central Florida
Contact:

Re: New Unigine Superposition performance benchmark

Post by FlyingPenguin »

I used the same settings as Genom. For a good comparison, you should run it again with the same settings we used, Nuby:

Image
"Turns out I’m 'woke.' All along, I thought I was just compassionate, kind, and good at history. "

Image
User avatar
Genom
Steely Eyed Missile Man
Posts: 866
Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2014 4:14 pm
Location: Hotlanta

Re: New Unigine Superposition performance benchmark

Post by Genom »

Man I wish those 1080 had not been so expensive when I bought the new card.
User avatar
Nuby1Canuby
Posts: 385
Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2012 10:45 am

Re: New Unigine Superposition performance benchmark

Post by Nuby1Canuby »

FlyingPenguin wrote:I used the same settings as Genom. For a good comparison, you should run it again with the same settings we used, Nuby:
I can't run the 4K preset. My videocard is 100K VRAM short of the benchmark requirement.
I can run the 1080P resolution with shaders at 4K and the 1080P Extreme preset.
It's bizarre that the 1080P Extreme preset runs over 3 times slower then the shaders at 4K.

Image

Image
User avatar
Nuby1Canuby
Posts: 385
Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2012 10:45 am

Re: New Unigine Superposition performance benchmark

Post by Nuby1Canuby »

I ignored the low VRAM memory error and ran the 4K optimized preset.
Image
User avatar
Genom
Steely Eyed Missile Man
Posts: 866
Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2014 4:14 pm
Location: Hotlanta

Re: New Unigine Superposition performance benchmark

Post by Genom »

1080 Extreme run:

Image
User avatar
FlyingPenguin
Flightless Bird
Posts: 32773
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2000 11:13 am
Location: Central Florida
Contact:

Re: New Unigine Superposition performance benchmark

Post by FlyingPenguin »

Not too big a difference between your 1070 and my 1080 in the 1080p Extreme test:

Image
"Turns out I’m 'woke.' All along, I thought I was just compassionate, kind, and good at history. "

Image
Post Reply