PCA Forums

You can get it here: https://unigine.com/en/products/benchma ... erposition

Even a GTX 1080 will only average 30 FPS at 1080P with the Extreme preset.


I ran it on my Radeon 290x @ 1080P and got an average FPS of 19.5 on the extreme preset and 45 on the high preset.

I ran it at 5280x1050 on my 290X. It was running about 21 FPS on high shaders so I had to drop them to medium.
It's not using much CPU. I ran it with Statuscore @1080P and the 4 cores were only averaging about 1000 GHz.

Doing the 4K optimized on my 1070 gave about 5800 score. Picked that rez so it was a similar number of pixels to yours since I dont do the multi desktop ona signle card.

Genom wrote:Doing the 4K optimized on my 1070 gave about 5800 score. Picked that rez so it was a similar number of pixels to yours since I dont do the multi desktop ona signle card.

What was the average FPS on that?

Here ya go:

I used the same settings as Genom. For a good comparison, you should run it again with the same settings we used, Nuby:

Man I wish those 1080 had not been so expensive when I bought the new card.

FlyingPenguin wrote:I used the same settings as Genom. For a good comparison, you should run it again with the same settings we used, Nuby:

I can't run the 4K preset. My videocard is 100K VRAM short of the benchmark requirement.
I can run the 1080P resolution with shaders at 4K and the 1080P Extreme preset.
It's bizarre that the 1080P Extreme preset runs over 3 times slower then the shaders at 4K.

I ignored the low VRAM memory error and ran the 4K optimized preset.

1080 Extreme run:

Not too big a difference between your 1070 and my 1080 in the 1080p Extreme test: