Who do you want to win?

Please keep ALL political views and comments to this forum. Let it all hang out, but try, and be somewhat civil

Who's your Prez?

John Kerry (Democrats)
9
36%
George W. Bush (Republicans)
16
64%
 
Total votes: 25

User avatar
pseizure2000
Genuine Member
Posts: 81
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 4:41 pm
Location: United States
Contact:

Who do you want to win?

Post by pseizure2000 »

:D Okay, so now that we are doubtless that John Kerry will be the Democratic Candidate for the up-and-coming 2004 elections....you must as yourself....Stick with the Incumbant...Or Make way for Change.

:chug choose well and prosper :up


Image Image
Didn't you know?
-Know what?
Starbucks has taken over the world.
-WHAT!?
PreDatoR
Life Member
Posts: 5554
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2000 8:01 pm

Post by PreDatoR »

neither are worthy to be president... but do we have much of a choice. unfortunately NO!
User avatar
dadx2mj
Posts: 4359
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2000 12:24 pm
Location: So Cal

Post by dadx2mj »

I must admit that Bush has been a little bit of a disappointment to me but I still think he is the lesser of the two evils and I am sticking with him
Image
User avatar
nexus_7
Posts: 10306
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2000 12:09 pm
Location: chicago land area.
Contact:

Post by nexus_7 »

yep, what you 2 said.

I just wonder how he would have been if 9/11 didnt happen.

Greg
<a href="http://www.pcabusers.org" target="_new"> <img src="http://www.pcabusers.org/images1/banner.jpg" border="0"></a>
<a target=NEW href="http://setiathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/stats/team/team_87793.html">JOIN the PCA Seti Team!</a>
User avatar
Pugsley
Posts: 7454
Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2002 11:54 pm
Location: NW Indiana
Contact:

Post by Pugsley »

not to be a kill joy... shouldent this be in the political forums?
[align=center]A self-aware artificial intelligence would suffer from a divide by zero error if it were programmed to be Amish[/align]
User avatar
Red Dawn
Golden Member
Posts: 1076
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2000 3:44 am
Location: Everett MA/Boston

Post by Red Dawn »

Originally posted by nexus_7
yep, what you 2 said.

I just wonder how he would have been if 9/11 didnt happen.

Greg
Well 9/11 and the events that followed defines his presidency. Without those events I wonder if he would have concentrated more on legislating Morality
Ich bin ein PC Mißbrauch
Walleye
Senior Member
Posts: 446
Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2004 4:30 pm
Location: San Diego
Contact:

Post by Walleye »

i demand a libertarian.
Image
User avatar
pseizure2000
Genuine Member
Posts: 81
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 4:41 pm
Location: United States
Contact:

Post by pseizure2000 »

Someone just told me that Kerry accused people of the sikh religion of being the cause of terrorism in America....it caused a pretty big uproar in India.
Didn't you know?
-Know what?
Starbucks has taken over the world.
-WHAT!?
User avatar
sbp
Posts: 3785
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2000 2:36 am
Contact:

Post by sbp »

If the Democrats had been really serious about winning this election they wouldn't have chosen a tall Dukakis. Its like someone lied to the Dems and said a flaming liberal could do a better job than a moderate at fighting Bush. :rollin
User avatar
sbp
Posts: 3785
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2000 2:36 am
Contact:

Kerry: singhing a different tune now

Post by sbp »

Originally posted by pseizure2000
Someone just told me that Kerry accused people of the sikh religion of being the cause of terrorism in America....it caused a pretty big uproar in India.
Funny how the media here didn't report this. Image

Kerry apologises to Sikhs
Senator John Kerry, US Democratic Presidential front-runner, has regretted the ‘’imprecision’’ of his remarks in which he referred to the Sikhs as terrorists.

During a campaign speech in Oklahoma last month, Senator Kerry had linked the Sikhs with terrorism, sparking off a sharp reaction from the community all across the USA.

He is the front-runner for the Democratic nomination for US President. “It has been brought to my attention that remarks I made on Saturday, January 31, have been misunderstood to imply that adherents of the Sikh faith condon terrorism. Nothing could be farther from the truth and I regret that the imprecision of my statement led to this misunderstanding.

“I am deeply sorry for the offence caused by this comment. I was, of course, referring to specific terrorist groups, which have invoked Sikhism and committed past acts of terror in India. I realise that, like me, the vast majority of Sikhs in the USA and worldwide abhor terrorism. I also know that stereotypes, discrimination, and abuse haunt Sikh Americans living and working in this nation. Sikh Americans have made enormous and invaluable contributions to our nation for which I am exceedingly grateful,’’ Senator Kerry said in a statement on February 6 quoted by the Washington-based Sikh Council on Religion and Education (SCORE).
User avatar
MK888
Posts: 966
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2000 10:51 pm
Location: NYC

Post by MK888 »

I am a Bush supporter, but to be honest I dont like what he has been up to lately. I honestly wish there were a third candidate. Maybe I will get a write in ballot, and vote for myself.
Behold The Power Of Cheese!!!!

Image


My DVD Collection
Walleye
Senior Member
Posts: 446
Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2004 4:30 pm
Location: San Diego
Contact:

Post by Walleye »

Originally posted by sbp
If the Democrats had been really serious about winning this election they wouldn't have chosen a tall Dukakis. Its like someone lied to the Dems and said a flaming liberal could do a better job than a moderate at fighting Bush. :rollin



actually that's pretty much what Noam Chompsky said.

He beleives that the democrats went as a party more towards the center instead of more left, and it cost them the houses and the presidency. I think to a degree he was right, but then again, what do i know.. i'm the devil on earth according to the democrats. lol.
Image
Walleye
Senior Member
Posts: 446
Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2004 4:30 pm
Location: San Diego
Contact:

Post by Walleye »

" Sikh Americans have made enormous and invaluable contributions to our nation for which I am exceedingly grateful,’"



say what? name one thing a sikh american has done :P


seriously, this kind of pandering is just pathetic. they havent made any significant contributions, and if they had, they should be recognized as exceptional persons, not somehow elevating the sikh culture.
Image
User avatar
Red Dawn
Golden Member
Posts: 1076
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2000 3:44 am
Location: Everett MA/Boston

Post by Red Dawn »

Ich bin ein PC Mißbrauch
User avatar
TheSovereign
Posts: 2957
Joined: Mon Apr 15, 2002 4:03 am
Location: chicago
Contact:

Post by TheSovereign »

behold kerrys significant voter record
In 1993, Introduced Plan To Cut Numerous Defense Programs, Including:

ü Cut the number of Navy submarines and their crews

ü Reduce the number of light infantry units in the Army down to one

ü Reduce tactical fighter wings in the Air Force

ü Terminate the Navy's coastal mine-hunting ship program

ü Force the retirement of no less than 60,000 members of the Armed Forces in one year. (S.1163, Introduced 6/24/93, http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin ... is.txt.pdf)

Has Voted Repeatedly To Cut Defense Spending, Including:

ü In 1993, Voted Against Increased Defense Spending For Military Pay Raise.Kerry voted to kill an increase in military pay over five years. (S. Con. Res. 18, CQ Vote #73: Motion Agreed To 55-42: R 2-39; D 53-3, 3/24/93, Kerry Voted Yea)

ü In 1992, Voted To Cut $6 Billion From Defense. Republicans and Democrats successfully blocked the attempt to cut defense spending. (S. Con. Res. 106, CQ Vote #73: Motion Agreed To 53-40: R 38-1; D 15-39, 4/9/92, Kerry Voted Nay)

ü In 1991, Voted To Slash Over $3 Billion From Defense, Shift Money To Social Programs.Only 27 Senators joined Kerry in voting for the defense cut. (H.R. 2707, CQ Vote #182: Motion Rejected 28-69: R 3-39; D 25-30, 9/10/91, Kerry Voted Yea)

ü In 1991, Voted To Cut Defense Spending By 2%.Only 21 other Senators voted with Kerry, and the defense cut was defeated. (S. Con. Res. 29, CQ Vote #49: Motion Rejected 22-73: R 1-39; D 21-34, 4/25/91, Kerry Voted Yea)

Has Voted Repeatedly To Cut Or Eliminate Funding For B-2 Stealth Bomber.(H.R. 3072, CQ Vote #203: Rejected 29-71: R 2-43; D 27-28, 9/26/89, Kerry Voted Yea; H.R. 3072, CQ Vote #310: Rejected 29-68: R 3-41; D 26-27, 11/18/89, Kerry Voted Yea; S. 2884, CQ Vote #208: Rejected 43-56: R 8-36; D 35-20, 8/2/90, Kerry Voted Yea; S. 2884, CQ Vote #209: Rejected 45-53: R 9-34; D 36-19, 8/2/90, Kerry Voted Yea; S. 1507, CQ Vote #174: Rejected 42-57: R 7-36; D 35-21, 8/1/91, Kerry Voted Yea; H.R. 2521, CQ Vote #206: Motion Agreed To 51-48: R 36-7; D 15-41, 9/25/91, Kerry Voted Nay; S. 2403, CQ Vote #85: Adopted 61-38: R 7-36; D 54-2, 5/6/92, Kerry Voted Yea; S. 3114, CQ Vote #216: Rejected 45-53: R 8-35; D 37-18, 9/18/92, Kerry Voted Yea; S. 2182, CQ Vote #179: Rejected 45-55: R 8-36; D 37-19, 7/1/94, Kerry Voted Yea)

Has Voted Repeatedly Against Missile Defense. (S. 1507, CQ Vote #171: Motion Agreed To 60-38: R 40-3; D 20-35, 8/1/91, Kerry Voted Nay; S. 1507, CQ Vote #173: Rejected 46-52: R 5-38; D 41-14, 8/1/91, Kerry Voted Yea; H.R. 2521, CQ Vote #207: Motion Agreed To 50-49: R 38-5; D 12-44, 9/25/91, Kerry Voted Nay; S. 2403, CQ Vote #85: Adopted 61-38: R 7-36; D 54-2, 5/6/92, Kerry Voted Yea; S. 3114, CQ Vote #182: Rejected 43-49: R 34-5; D 9-44, 8/7/92, Kerry Voted Nay; S. 3114, CQ Vote #214: Rejected 48-50: R 5-38; D 43-12, 9/17/92, Kerry Voted Yea; S. 3114, CQ Vote #215: Adopted 52-46: R 39-4; D 13-42, 9/17/92, Kerry Voted Nay; S. 1298, CQ Vote #251: Adopted 50-48: R 6-36; D 44-12, 10/9/93, Kerry Voted Yea; S. Con. Res. 63, CQ Vote #64: Rejected 40-59: R 2-42; D 38-17, 3/22/94, Kerry Voted Yea; S. 1026, CQ Vote #354: Motion Agreed To 51-48: R 47-6; D 4-42, 8/3/95, Kerry Voted Nay; S. 1087, CQ Vote #384: Rejected 45-54: R 5-49; D 40-5, 8/10/95, Kerry Voted Yea; S. 1745, CQ Vote #160: Rejected 44-53: R 4-49; D 40-4, 6/19/96, Kerry Voted Yea; S. 1507, CQ Vote #168: Rejected 39-60: R 4-39; D 35-21, 7/31/91, Kerry Voted Yea; S. 1507, CQ Vote #172: Motion Agreed To 64-34: R 39-4; D 25-30, 8/1/91, Kerry Voted Nay; S. 1873, CQ Vote #131: Rejected 59-41: R 55-0; D 4-41; I 0-0, 5/13/98, Kerry Voted Nay; S. 1873, CQ Vote #262: Rejected 59-41: R 55-0; D 4-41, 9/9/98, Kerry Voted Nay; S 1635, CQ Vote #157: Rejected 53-46: R 52-0; D 1-46, 6/4/96, Kerry Voted Nay; S. 2549, CQ Vote #178: Motion Agreed To 52-48: R 52-3; D 0-45, 7/13/00, Kerry Voted Nay)

KERRY OPPOSED WEAPONS CRITICAL
TO RECENT MILITARY SUCCESSES

Running For Senate In 1984, Kerry Promised Massive Defense Cuts."Kerry in 1984 said he would have voted to cancel ... the B-1 bomber, B-2 stealth bomber, AH-64 Apache helicopter, Patriot missile, the F-15, F-14A and F-14D jets, the AV-8B Harrier jet, the Aegis air-defense cruiser, and the Trident missile system. He also advocated reductions in many other systems, such as the M1 Abrams tank, the Bradley Fighting Vehicle, the Tomahawk cruise missile, and the F-16 jet." (Brian C. Mooney, "Taking One Prize, Then A Bigger One," The Boston Globe, 6/19/03)

Weapons Kerry Sought To Phase Out Were Vital In Iraq."[K]erry supported cancellation of a host of weapons systems that have become the basis of US military might -- the high-tech munitions and delivery systems on display to the world as they leveled the Iraqi regime of Saddam Hussein in a matter of weeks." (Brian C. Mooney, "Taking One Prize, Then A Bigger One," The Boston Globe, 6/19/03)

ü F-16 Fighting Falcons."The Air Force would also play an important role in strikes against high-ranking officials of the Ba'ath regime. On April 4, two Air Force F-16 Fighting Falcons dropped laser-guided munitions on the house of Ali Hassan al-Majid, a.k.a. 'Chemical Ali,' in Basra." (Abraham Genauer, "Technology And Volume Of Sorties Overwhelmed The Iraqis' Defenses," The Hill, 5/21/03)

ü B-1Bs B-2As F-15 And F-16s."On the night of March 21 alone, the first of 'shock and awe,' coalition air forces flew nearly 2,000 missions. ... Involved were Air Force B-1B Lancers, B-2A Spirits, ... F-15E Strike Eagles and F-16 Fighting Falcons..." (Abraham Genauer, "Technology And Volume Of Sorties Overwhelmed The Iraqis' Defenses," The Hill, 5/21/03)

ü M1 Abrams."'[M1 Abrams] tanks were the sledgehammer in this war,' added Pat Garrett, an associate analyst with GlobalSecurity.org. 'The tank was the tool that allowed [the ground forces] to progress as fast as they did.'" (Patrick O'Connor, "Revolutionary Tank Tactics Alter Iraqi Conflict, Future Of Urban Warfare," The Hill, 5/21/03)

ü Patriot Missile."U.S. Central Command says the Patriots ... have improved to the point where they intercepted nine of the Iraqis' short-range al-Samoud 2 and Ababil-100 missiles in this conflict." (Andrea Stone, "Patriot Missile: Friend Or Foe To Allied Troops?" USA Today, 4/15/03)

ü AH-64 Apache Helicopter."Recently, Apaches in Afghanistan achieved success directly supporting ground troops. ... Whether in shaping the battle in a combined arms Warfighter-type fight where intelligence of the enemy is known, or by conducting close combat attacks in direct support of a ground commander, the Longbow Apache provides significantly increased flexibility and firepower for U.S. Army forces ..." (Maj. David J. Rude and Lt. Col. Daniel E. Williams, "The 'Warfighter Mindset' and the War in Iraq," Army Magazine, 7/03)

ü Tomahawk Cruise Missile."The first operational use [of Tomahawk cruise missiles] was in Operation Desert Storm, 1991, with immense success. The missile has since been used successfully in several other conflicts ... include[ing] Bosnia ... in 1995 and in Iraq again ... in 1996 ... [and in] strikes against training camps run by Osama Bin Laden's al-Qaeda network in Afghanistan in 1998. Cruise missiles were also fired during the air campaign over Kosovo in 1999." (Vivek Rai, "Cruise Missiles, By Air And Sea," MSNBC.com, Accessed 7/17/03)

ü Aegis Air-Defense Cruiser. "During Operation Iraqi Freedom, [the Aegis cruiser] Bunker Hill ... was one of the first warships to conduct Tomahawk strikes against leadership targets in Iraq. The ship launched a total of 31 missiles during the war. Its embarked ... helicopter detachment ... supported the rescue of United Nations workers being forcibly removed from oil platforms in the Northern Arabian Gulf and provided medical evacuations from the Iraqi city of Umm Qasr." (S.A. Thornbloom, "USS Bunker Hill Makes Revolutionary Return," NavyDispatch.com, Accessed 7/17/03)

During 1980s, Kerry And Michael Dukakis Joined Forces With Liberal Group Dedicated To Slashing Defense. Kerry sat on the board of "Jobs With Peace Campaign," which sought to "develop public support for cutting the defense budget..."("Pentagon Demonstrators Call For Home-Building, Not Bombs," The Associated Press, 6/3/88)

Running For Congress In 1972, Kerry Promised To Cut Defense Spending."On what he'll do if he's elected to Congress, Kerry said he would 'bring a different kind of message to the president.' He said he would vote against military appropriations." ("Candidate's For Congress Capture Campus In Andover," Lawrence [MA] Eagle-Tribune, 4/21/72)


this man would have our military die by denying them the tools they need to win
kerry: HOW DARE WE DEFEND OURSELFS

red dawn if u vote for this man u should crawl under a rock and fear any veteran
if kerry wins im going to be unhappy....theirs more to this but i dare not put it in writing
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=67rc96joOz8#t=0m58s">YodelRoll!</a>
<a href="http://www.halfinchbullet.com/">Goto HalfInchBullet.com!</a>
Image
Post Reply