Neil Armstrong slams Obama NASA plans

Please keep ALL political views and comments to this forum. Let it all hang out, but try, and be somewhat civil
Post Reply
User avatar
Executioner
Life Member
Posts: 10141
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2000 11:34 am
Location: Woodland, CA USA

Neil Armstrong slams Obama NASA plans

Post by Executioner »

I fully agree with Neil's comments.
Former astronaut Neil Armstrong has issued a strongly worded rebuke of President Barack Obama, criticizing the president for proposed revisions to the U.S.' space program.

Armstrong, along with astronauts James Lovell and Eugene Cernan, called the proposal “devastating” in a letter obtained by NBC News. Read below for the full text:

"The United States entered into the challenge of space exploration under President Eisenhower’s first term, however, it was the Soviet Union who excelled in those early years," the letter begins."Under the bold vision of Presidents Kennedy, Johnson, and Nixon, and with the overwhelming approval of the American people, we rapidly closed the gap in the final third of the 20th century, and became the world leader in space exploration. ...

"When President Obama recently released his budget for NASA, he proposed a slight increase in total funding, substantial research and technology development, an extension of the International Space Station operation until 2020, long range planning for a new but undefined heavy lift rocket and significant funding for the development of commercial access to low earth orbit.

"Although some of these proposals have merit, the accompanying decision to cancel the Constellation program, its Ares 1 and Ares V rockets, and the Orion spacecraft, is devastating.

"America’s only path to low Earth orbit and the International Space Station will now be subject to an agreement with Russia to purchase space on their Soyuz (at a price of over 50 million dollars per seat with significant increases expected in the near future) until we have the capacity to provide transportation for ourselves. The availability of a commercial transport to orbit as envisioned in the President’s proposal cannot be predicted with any certainty, but is likely to take substantially longer and be more expensive than we would hope.

"It appears that we will have wasted our current ten plus billion dollar investment in Constellation and, equally importantly, we will have lost the many years required to recreate the equivalent of what we will have discarded.

For The United States, the leading space faring nation for nearly half a century, to be without carriage to low Earth orbit and with no human exploration capability to go beyond Earth orbit for an indeterminate time into the future, destines our nation to become one of second or even third rate stature. While the President's plan envisages humans traveling away from Earth and perhaps toward Mars at some time in the future, the lack of developed rockets and spacecraft will assure that ability will not be available for many years.

Without the skill and experience that actual spacecraft operation provides, the USA is far too likely to be on a long downhill slide to mediocrity. America must decide if it wishes to remain a leader in space. If it does, we should institute a program which will give us the very best chance of achieving that goal.

Neil Armstrong
Commander, Apollo 11

James Lovell
Commander, Apollo 13

Eugene Cernan
Commander, Apollo 17
Image

http://www.politico.com/click/stories/1 ... space.html
User avatar
normalicy
Posts: 9513
Joined: Sat Nov 25, 2000 4:04 am
Location: St. Louis, MO USA
Contact:

Post by normalicy »

This is sad indeed. Though, if there are genuine efforts to reach Mars, it'll soften the blow for me.
User avatar
FlyingPenguin
Flightless Bird
Posts: 32784
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2000 11:13 am
Location: Central Florida
Contact:

Post by FlyingPenguin »

Yeah I'm pretty disgusted with how NASA is being castrated. Of course no one wants to spend money on space when the economy sucks.

I'm still waiting for my Lunar vacation...
Christians warn us about the anti-christ for 2,000 years, and when he shows up, they buy a bible from him.

Image
User avatar
TheSovereign
Posts: 2957
Joined: Mon Apr 15, 2002 4:03 am
Location: chicago
Contact:

Post by TheSovereign »

FlyingPenguin wrote:Yeah I'm pretty disgusted with how NASA is being castrated. Of course no one wants to spend money on space when the economy sucks.

I'm still waiting for my Lunar vacation...
we dont have any money the national debt is higher than gdp...
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=67rc96joOz8#t=0m58s">YodelRoll!</a>
<a href="http://www.halfinchbullet.com/">Goto HalfInchBullet.com!</a>
Image
User avatar
FlyingPenguin
Flightless Bird
Posts: 32784
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2000 11:13 am
Location: Central Florida
Contact:

Post by FlyingPenguin »

Well I hate to break your heart, Sov, but this doesn't mean we're cutting NASA's budget - it's actually going up slightly. NASA's budget is a flea spec compared to everything else. NASA's budget is 0.52% of the entire federal budget: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NASA_Budget

All we're doing is killing manned space craft and turning it over to private contractors, which in the long run is probably the best thing to do anyway. The government once ran the airlines but the air transport business didn't take off until commercial companies got involved.

Meanwhile NASA concentrates on what it does best: robotic probes. It's just not as glamorous

Long term (and I'm talking decades to centuries) we WILL need a serious human presence in space since we'll need to start mining comets and asteroids eventually, although it can be argued that by then we might be able to do it all robotically.
Christians warn us about the anti-christ for 2,000 years, and when he shows up, they buy a bible from him.

Image
Post Reply