Half an operating system: The triumph and tragedy of OS/2
Posted: Sun Dec 01, 2019 3:04 pm
This was a great nostalgic read about the Era of computing that I cut my teeth on.
I owned the original IBM PC, running MS-DOS (although I also owned a copy of CP/M 86 that ended up being a dead end). Later, in the x386 and x486 Era I grudgingly used (and despised) Windows 95, because that's where all the good apps were at the time - except for games of course. REAL games ran in DOS
I did briefly use OS/2 at work, but like the article mentions, we were all using Windows apps in a virtual window under OS/2 because they ran better, and you had more choices.
However EVERYTHING changed when Window NT was released. That was a real Windows OS (not just a thin GUI over DOS) and I made it my primary OS for long time - the server version actually which was much more stable than the workstation version (yeah, I played thousands of hours of Counter Strike under Windows NT Server). Then eventually Windows 2000 (only because Microsoft screwed us and never really delivered proper USB support for Windows NT that they had promised). Never used Win98 much except on a laptop.
https://arstechnica.com/information-tec ... dy-of-os2/
I owned the original IBM PC, running MS-DOS (although I also owned a copy of CP/M 86 that ended up being a dead end). Later, in the x386 and x486 Era I grudgingly used (and despised) Windows 95, because that's where all the good apps were at the time - except for games of course. REAL games ran in DOS
I did briefly use OS/2 at work, but like the article mentions, we were all using Windows apps in a virtual window under OS/2 because they ran better, and you had more choices.
However EVERYTHING changed when Window NT was released. That was a real Windows OS (not just a thin GUI over DOS) and I made it my primary OS for long time - the server version actually which was much more stable than the workstation version (yeah, I played thousands of hours of Counter Strike under Windows NT Server). Then eventually Windows 2000 (only because Microsoft screwed us and never really delivered proper USB support for Windows NT that they had promised). Never used Win98 much except on a laptop.
https://arstechnica.com/information-tec ... dy-of-os2/