[updated] my first nvidia card--drivers?

Discussions and tips on NVidia, ATI, etc. and Video Editing Forum
User avatar
Hipnotic_Tranz
Almighty Member
Posts: 3750
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2000 6:35 am
Location: Indpls, IN
Contact:

[updated] my first nvidia card--drivers?

Post by Hipnotic_Tranz »

I'm curious what the best drivers for the Geforce2 line is? I have a 32meg Quadro2 running the Detenator 3 (12.90) drivers and I'm getting pretty poor frame-rates. I ran the latest and these (older) drivers run better.

In Quake3, I'm getting 39fps on 800x600x32, medium geometric detail, and medium texture detail. All my other games run fine (q2@1024x768-66fps, q1@1280x1024-80fps) I'm happy with how all my other games are running but Quake3 is lacking bigtime I think. The machine it's running on is an Athlon 650, 192mb RAM, 30gig hard drive, SBLive! Value, GF2 Quadro2. Definitly a decent machine. I would have hoped to get atleast 50fps in 1024x768, 32bit color, medium texture. I consider 60+ perfectly fine and anything below that a little slow. But ~40fps isn't playable, I don't think. Specially once you get into battle with a few other people.


Is this feasable? Is it my hardware or the drivers? Which drivers are the best?
[align=center]<img src=http://i54.tinypic.com/j9tydf.gif>
<i>
My get up and go
must have got up and went.
</i>[/align]
User avatar
dadx2mj
Posts: 4359
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2000 12:24 pm
Location: So Cal

Post by dadx2mj »

Get teh newest from nvidia. Just about everybody got better performance when they went to the Det4 drivers.
Image
User avatar
Hipnotic_Tranz
Almighty Member
Posts: 3750
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2000 6:35 am
Location: Indpls, IN
Contact:

Post by Hipnotic_Tranz »

well I tried the new drivers again and they aren't any better. I put everything down to the lowest of the low on 640x480 and got 44frames. Only 4 frames more than when I had it on 800x600 everything maxxed. What da hell?

I'm beginning to think it might not be driver related. Would any BIOS settings have this much of an effect on frame-rates? Anything in windows? WHen the computer comes from a cold boot I have 95% free resources! Only explorer and point32 (Intellimouse software) are running. Like I said, the card works great in all the other games, but is horrible in Q3.

[edit]
and yes, I do play q3. I'm not just tryin' to score high in some benchmark. It really is not playable at this point :(
[align=center]<img src=http://i54.tinypic.com/j9tydf.gif>
<i>
My get up and go
must have got up and went.
</i>[/align]
User avatar
chottoED
Almighty Member
Posts: 2340
Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2000 1:00 am
Location: Chicago
Contact:

Post by chottoED »

actually i really think the bottleneck is the athlon 650... mebbe you can try overclocking it and see if there's an improvement? the #'s may not get too high as long as it's running in 32bit w/ the cpu at 650

also get the latest release patch for Q3A... if you are using win2k, get the latest update (especially sp2)

have fun w/ that rocking card you got!

p.s. can u list all the components you have? (exact models)
<a href="http://folding.extremeoverclocking.com/user_summary.php?s=&u=38801" target=_blank><img src="http://home.comcast.net/~techgod723/pics/godaddy.gif"></a>
User avatar
Hipnotic_Tranz
Almighty Member
Posts: 3750
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2000 6:35 am
Location: Indpls, IN
Contact:

Post by Hipnotic_Tranz »

Sup :)

Athlon 650
Abit KA7-100
192mb PC133 RAM
SbLive! Value
GeForce2
2 - 15gig IBM 75GXP's (were in RAID-0 but not currently)
40x CD-ROM (that is really dirty by the way--that or it's just a POS which I would believe also :) )

Thats about it really. Running Win98SE from a fresh install (the vid card you sent me was the last component I needed for this "backup" machine) Running v1.30 in Q3 which is the latest from my knowledge. I could upgrade the CPU in this machine cheap but I'd have to pay for it since my parents think it's fine as it is (and I basically gave it to them to get them out of my room just for the internet).

But I need the [little] money I have now for a sub for my HT setup so this machine will just have to do. My comp is a 1.4 AthlonXP :) I was just hoping for better scores. I'll have to play around with it. Runs great in all other games though, so thats good :D
[align=center]<img src=http://i54.tinypic.com/j9tydf.gif>
<i>
My get up and go
must have got up and went.
</i>[/align]
User avatar
dadx2mj
Posts: 4359
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2000 12:24 pm
Location: So Cal

Post by dadx2mj »

Might try checking out http://www.geforcefaq.com they might have to tip to help you out.
Image
User avatar
Busby
Golden Member
Posts: 1890
Joined: Tue Nov 28, 2000 6:25 pm
Location: Atlanta Area, GA, USA
Contact:

Post by Busby »

I got 60fps using a Voodoo 3 and Celeron 366@550 at 800x600. Change it from 32-bit color and see what happens. 23.11 drivers are the best nvidia drivers out.
wet behind the ears
Genuine Member
Posts: 28
Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2001 7:30 pm
Location: Canada

Post by wet behind the ears »

I['m guessing its the processor that is the bottle neck in your system. Go with drivers that work the best, regardless of age. Hell, when I was running WIN 98 I was running Det version 6.34's. The latest Quake update is 1.31. Check it out.

wbte/
User avatar
Hipnotic_Tranz
Almighty Member
Posts: 3750
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2000 6:35 am
Location: Indpls, IN
Contact:

Post by Hipnotic_Tranz »

Originally posted by Busby
I got 60fps using a Voodoo 3 and Celeron 366@550 at 800x600. Change it from 32-bit color and see what happens. 23.11 drivers are the best nvidia drivers out.
Running 23.11 drivers Already tried putting it to 16-bit color and that didn't do a lick a difference (except made it look worse :) ) I dont think the CPU is the bottleneck so much as it's just not configured right or something. I had my AIW Radeon in this machine and was getting 60FPS before. Guess I'll just have to play around with it--even though I don't really know what it is I have to change.
[align=center]<img src=http://i54.tinypic.com/j9tydf.gif>
<i>
My get up and go
must have got up and went.
</i>[/align]
User avatar
chottoED
Almighty Member
Posts: 2340
Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2000 1:00 am
Location: Chicago
Contact:

Post by chottoED »

you can overclock the card...
there's no way you can fry the thing w/ all the extra cooling i put on it...
also... whatever you do - DO NOT CHANGE YOUR TEXEL ALIGNMENT SETTINGS
doing so screws up the fonts in your d3d games
<a href="http://folding.extremeoverclocking.com/user_summary.php?s=&u=38801" target=_blank><img src="http://home.comcast.net/~techgod723/pics/godaddy.gif"></a>
User avatar
rogue
Golden Member
Posts: 872
Joined: Sat Dec 09, 2000 10:40 pm
Location: Shore of Orion
Contact:

Post by rogue »

The cpu is definitely the bottleneck, sorry to say. No amount of tweaking will raise your fps above 50, with that CPU and Vid card combo. Q2 and Q1 are really old games, so its not a surprise that they run well. I would try running a different OS, preferably Win2k, and see if that does anything.
Welcome to the machine.
ji1831
Senior Member
Posts: 169
Joined: Thu Dec 28, 2000 11:38 pm
Location: Mill Creek Washington

hey............

Post by ji1831 »

try this site (http://www.nvidia.com/view.asp?PAGE=pg_20010527321700) it said something about quadro video cards. it might help
User avatar
Hipnotic_Tranz
Almighty Member
Posts: 3750
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2000 6:35 am
Location: Indpls, IN
Contact:

Post by Hipnotic_Tranz »

This is wierd.

Athlon 650
Abit KA7-100
192mb PC133 RAM
GeForce2

~40fps

PIII 450
192mb PC100 RAM
Geforce 256 (original)

~45fps


The second system is my friends. how is a slower computer with a slower/older video card getting more frames? Thus, I don't believe the CPU is the bottleneck as I've said all along.....(I know it is to a point, but c'mon--we're on the exact same settings in q3 and windows)
[align=center]<img src=http://i54.tinypic.com/j9tydf.gif>
<i>
My get up and go
must have got up and went.
</i>[/align]
grumpy 1
Senior Member
Posts: 118
Joined: Wed Nov 21, 2001 6:08 pm

poor frame rates

Post by grumpy 1 »

hey i may have overlooked this but can you tell me what mb your pc is running is it a via chipset a amd chipset or a amd via chipset combo
i used to run q3 on a athlon 700 and a geforce 2 and used to get awesome frame rates so i think something else is going on there

Cheers
User avatar
Hipnotic_Tranz
Almighty Member
Posts: 3750
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2000 6:35 am
Location: Indpls, IN
Contact:

Post by Hipnotic_Tranz »

As stated in the above thread, I'm running an Abit KA7-100 (via chipset) with an Athlon 650 (classic--not a t-bird or anything).
[align=center]<img src=http://i54.tinypic.com/j9tydf.gif>
<i>
My get up and go
must have got up and went.
</i>[/align]
Post Reply