Wouldnt mind getting in on This action

nexus_7 · Post by **nexus_7** » Wed Apr 03, 2002 4:26 pm

Aww.

the pic is gone.

Oh looks tasty.

Greg

d_b · Post by **d_b** » Wed Apr 03, 2002 5:52 pm

Oh, I thought it was a babe thread.

SWScorch · Post by **SWScorch** » Wed Apr 03, 2002 7:03 pm

<a href="ftp://Anonymous@24.24.29.152/myimages/pimp.jpg">I got better

</a>

Gand1 · Post by **Gand1** » Wed Apr 03, 2002 8:16 pm

Let me guess.... one is the sister and the other is a friend of the sister!

J/K

Hope you had fun!

Jim Z · Post by **Jim Z** » Wed Apr 03, 2002 8:53 pm

NascarFool · Post by **NascarFool** » Wed Apr 03, 2002 10:53 pm

Look at them ram slots. WOW !

EvilHorace · Post by **EvilHorace** » Thu Apr 04, 2002 12:29 am

A while back (maybe a month) I posted a question about dual cpus in this forum and Doc Silly pretty much summed it up.
http://www.pcabusers.com/forums/showthr ... adid=16758
Although the idea sounds tempting to most at first, the average PC user gains nothing by going that route vs just upgrading to the latest single cpu, mobo, ram combo (oh, I'll add a good, fast HDD as well, often apparently neglected by some who upgrade often). The dual cpu use has only a few real advantages to a few situations that many of us here would never really need. It's not like you'll get twice the power or speed.

nexus_7 · Post by **nexus_7** » Thu Apr 04, 2002 12:35 am

yea...But this is the New amd stuff. who really cares if it is practical...its the new king on the block.

Greg

Jim Z · Post by **Jim Z** » Thu Apr 04, 2002 1:56 am

yea...But this is the New amd stuff.

say what? That was a Xeon board.

poop · Post by **poop** » Thu Apr 04, 2002 7:51 am

Yeah, those are not AMD sockets, at least they don't LOOK like AMD sockets.

The pin count is too high, and the layout is too dense.

Jim Z · Post by **Jim Z** » Thu Apr 04, 2002 8:35 am

Socket 603. Foster/Prestonia Xeons.

nexus_7 · Post by **nexus_7** » Thu Apr 04, 2002 10:22 am

eithor way, Wouldnt mind playing with it.

Greg