what is your res is your desktop set to, and why

Discussions about anything Computer Hardware Related. Overclocking, underclocking and talk about the latest or even the oldest technology. PCA Reviews feedback

what is your desktop res set to

Poll ended at Sun Jun 16, 2002 6:21 pm

or less
0
No votes
640 x 480
0
No votes
800 x 600
2
5%
960 x 720
0
No votes
1024 x 768
17
40%
1152 x 864
12
28%
1280 x 960
3
7%
1280 x 1024
7
16%
or more
2
5%
 
Total votes: 43

VooDoo
Golden Member
Posts: 1553
Joined: Sat May 04, 2002 6:31 pm
Location: earth
Contact:

what is your res is your desktop set to, and why

Post by VooDoo »

what is your res is your desktop set to, and why
User avatar
MAC
Golden Member
Posts: 599
Joined: Sat Nov 25, 2000 8:07 pm
Location: No Place But Texas!!

Post by MAC »

I run mine at 1152 x 864. After installing XP Pro, the desktop icons at 1024 x 768 looked kinda blurry so I upped the resolution to 1152. Any higher and I can't read them.
User avatar
Hipnotic_Tranz
Almighty Member
Posts: 3750
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2000 6:35 am
Location: Indpls, IN
Contact:

Post by Hipnotic_Tranz »

1280x1024 on a 19" monitor. I like the destkop room, although recently I hvae made it so there is not a single icon on my desktop :) . I have changed all my fonts and made them bigger to make them easier to read.
[align=center]<img src=http://i54.tinypic.com/j9tydf.gif>
<i>
My get up and go
must have got up and went.
</i>[/align]
User avatar
d_b
Posts: 2617
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2000 6:16 am
Location: Culver Indiana

Post by d_b »

Monitor 1-1280x1024@60 Hertz, Monitor 2 - 1280x1024@100Hertz. Seems to be easist on the eyes.
I'm not lazy by nature, I work very hard at being lazy.
User avatar
Busby
Golden Member
Posts: 1890
Joined: Tue Nov 28, 2000 6:25 pm
Location: Atlanta Area, GA, USA
Contact:

Post by Busby »

1600x1200 because, basically, I can. I mean you don't really worry about scrolling on a lot of things and plus why not? :)
<a href="mailto:busby1218@charter.net">
<img src="http://justinbusby.com:8080/signature.gif" border="0"></a>
JonasWorld
Genuine Member
Posts: 69
Joined: Mon Feb 05, 2001 8:44 pm
Location: Philly Suburbanite

Post by JonasWorld »

1024x768 on a 19in flatscreen

Any smaller and I can't read any writing. Although maybe I need to do what HT does and bump up my font size.
AMD XP1800
Soyo SY-K7V Dragon+
VisionTek GeForce 4 TI4600
Onboard Audio
Onboard NIC
TDK 52X Burner
Aopen 16X DVD
512mb Crucial 2100
NEC MultiSync FE950+
Generic Aluminum Colored case with modded side fan
blade
Posts: 9113
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2000 1:56 am
Location: LV-426
Contact:

Post by blade »

1152x864x32 on a 19"

Just seems the best fit for my eyes. I do have the font size larger though.
[align=center]<img src="http://www.statgfx.com/statgfx/folding/?&username=blade&border=0,0,64&custom=21,138,255&label=79,79,255&header=149,202,255&stats=0,255,255&bgcolor=0,0,181&trans=no&template=fah_original&.jpg" alt="www.Statgfx.com" />
<img src="http://www.pcabusers.org/funnies/monkey2.gif">
<i><small>"Too much monkee business"</i></small>[/align]
User avatar
FlyingPenguin
Flightless Bird
Posts: 33161
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2000 11:13 am
Location: Central Florida
Contact:

Post by FlyingPenguin »

Dual monitors here:

1280 x 960 on the main 19" monitor
1152 x 864 on the 2nd 19"

Using the Windows Standard Large text layout.

I like the res set as high as I can comfortably stand it. The more desktop real estate the better.
---
“The Government of Spain will not applaud those who set the world on fire just because they show up with a bucket.” - Prime Minister of Spain, Pedro Sánchez

Image
User avatar
FuNPoLiCe001
Posts: 987
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2000 4:57 pm
Location: T dot O dot
Contact:

Post by FuNPoLiCe001 »

1152 x 864, nice ratio, 1280 x 1024 is too flat

and i like how i can see better since my screen is like 3 feet away from me
Let Cam, take care of your breasts
VooDoo
Golden Member
Posts: 1553
Joined: Sat May 04, 2002 6:31 pm
Location: earth
Contact:

Post by VooDoo »

Originally posted by Busby
1600x1200 because, basically, I can. I mean you don't really worry about scrolling on a lot of things and plus why not? :)
did think they vould get that big (er small i mean)

me
Jim Z
Golden Member
Posts: 969
Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2001 9:22 pm
Location: MI

Post by Jim Z »

1280x1024 because that's my LCD's native resolution. Anything else looks like ass.
User avatar
Executioner
Life Member
Posts: 10351
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2000 11:34 am
Location: Woodland, CA USA

Post by Executioner »

1152x864x32 on a 17" monitor, but for gaming, I use 800x600.
User avatar
VidmanII
Posts: 2465
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2000 9:54 pm
Location: Egg Harbor, NJ

Post by VidmanII »

rig #1

20" = 11 x 8
19" = 11 x 8

both @ 100 Hz, 32-bit

rig #2

17" = 10 x 7, 85 Hz, 32-bit
AMD Ph II X4 955 BE 3.2 @ 3.8 GHz | Scythe SCSMZ-2000 | ASRock 880GMH/USB3 | 8 GB G.Skill DDR3 1600 | Radeon HD5670 | Kingston 128GB SSD
User avatar
DocSilly
Posts: 1558
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2000 8:24 am
Location: Germany
Contact:

Post by DocSilly »

1600x1200 on my 21" Sony cause I can and I really got used to the available desktop space.
User avatar
wvjohn
Posts: 9238
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2000 7:09 am
Contact:

Post by wvjohn »

1024x768 'cause that's the best I can see with these cheap glasses :)
<a href="http://www.heatware.com/eval.php?id=123" target="_blank" >Heatware</a>
Post Reply